Haven''t figure out Article Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words - 1

Havent figure out - Article ExampleCulture, on the other hand, represents the set of practices that secure a particular society. Persons with the same assimilation tend to have similar interpretations of the surrounding events. The reason is that the individuals sh are that the philology they share represent. In other words, the linguistics of a particular society tends to illuminate on the culture of a particular society. The reason is that the language is the biggest composition of the culture of a particular people. The culture thus involves the polar behaviors that make up the lifestyle of a particular group.The cultural difference is the distinction that tends to form a contrast in different ideas that are acceptable to the contrasting societies. However, the variation may be due to the different level of understanding or due to other factors. Those people practices are the primary sources of the differences in culture.The study of culture, language and the consequent culture differences tend to have a signifi tidy sumt impact. The step is the source for cohesion in nigh of the conflicting societies in the world. The understanding of culture and the basic changes that characterize its transmission help in the knowledge of the behavior and attitudes of the society under study. The perception tends to mend on the mutual tolerance. The action correspondingly improves on the unity and peace that characterizes the populations that accrue around the globe.The article above is a constituent article that can appear in a magazine or a periodical. However, the best document is an online site. The site is optimum since it tends to provide a direct link and scattering of the literature is simpler and much easier to reach the target market. The focus on the culture and the different perspectives needs to appear in weekly publications (Jones, 2002). The reason is that the topic on culture is significant in the maintenance of a cohesive society. Besides, the public ation

Self Evaluation Essay Example for Free

Self Evaluation EssayI was quite confident ab emerge my authorship mode and had the conception that I am competent enough. But when more than one of my projects got remarks like improve your writing skill and work hard on your writing style, I was shocked and was unable to look for my faults. I had to discuss with one of my teachers who explained that I was apply parallelism in my writing style, which was quite boring and repetitive. beca intake I noniced that I was using some of the words quite a administer of conviction and they were even repeated quite a lot of times in one single sentence. When I read my story I found that lots of characters were created which either confused the reader or left(a) them bewildered. I had to really work hard so that I make my essays or stories interesting for the reader. While analyzing my early essays I found that most of the time I got diverted from the main stream of discussion and wasted my pages on not so important issues. I now u nderstand it was because I read to draw on outline of my essay before finally writing it. I should deal the objectives and organize them according to the preferences required hile writing it.Repetitive use of words or phrases spoils the charm of writing and fails to make story interesting. Even if the plot is good and organised, it needs to be appealing so that the reader finds it out of the ordinary. I had the idea that repetitive use of words and phrases add weight to your work exclusively it is not in essays or stories. It gives the impression that the writer is using same words in force(p) because he is lacking original ideas for the story. This gives a bad impression and cuts your marks eventually. I was always against plagiarism and had the idea that it is just copying word by word of some other writers work.But even if you use some facts by changing few words with their synonyms is also categorized under plagiarism. It was quite difficult to understand this issue but I g o forth have to work on it so that my essays atomic number 18 not remarked as plagiarized. I use sources from Internet or some times related books to research on any matter. I have written different essays on numerous subjects and all I was able to find on Internet. I researched and then collected the matter, read and organized them and wrote iving my opinion on the issue.I have been getting experienced in different types of essays dealing personal as well as public issues. I worked on various writing styles like MLA format, APA format, Chicago style and many more. Initially these were quite new for me but as I worked cautiously and followed the instructions it has be get into quite easy for me now. To mesmerize the reader it is important to maintain the charm of your topic and suspense of the story till its end. For a good writer it is important that the reader has lots of quarries hile reading the story so that he is not in a position to leave reading it until he ends it.It is a n ongoing process and one needs to improve a lot to become a good writer. Lots of practice and a good guidance will help you improve your writing skills. When I was first pointed out with my mistakes I thought I would never be able to improve these things as they come in flow of my natural way of writing. But I was wrong because during the course I was not only able to get rid of my drawbacks but also improved and made my writing style interesting from the point of view of readers.Now this is the most important thing for a writer and he/she can get rewards only when his work gets appreciated by his/her readers. There are lots of things to be taken in to consideration when you research on writing skills and you will feel that you need to learn quite a lot of stuff on the art of writing. It is actually a vast subject and there are things that are required to learn and some areas get developed with your experience too. I found that the areas, which used to involve me for hours while w riting an essay is now engaging me for remarkably less time.These all happened because of correct learning procedure and practice also. As far as parallelism is considered it is not completely useless but you will find it very useful while writing employment documents. Here you need to put stress on some person or his qualities and it is effective only when you repeat words and phrases. So avoiding parallel style of writing entirely is not right. There are times when you need to echo some facts and there you will need this style along with balance and rhythm so that you are able to stock your actual meaning and intention.

Modern and Contemporary Essay Example for Free

Modern and Contemporary EssayThis paper deals with ii things in relation to pantheism first a few samples of the contemporary literature, which argue very little and unpersuasively, However, two major historical theorists of pantheism, de Spinoza and his later follower, Schelling, serve to delivery the theory and place it on a firmer, to a greater extent scientific ground. Pantheism has moven realityy sorts throughout its history, and no one definition will suffice to score in all particular manifestations of this phenomenon.One of the main disconnects concerning pantheism as an ontology is to what extent Pantheism tummy be called a religion this is the real issue. The modern, contemporary pantheists seem to sport no religion whatsoever no idol, no doctrine. The contemporary readings on this question seem to socialize the vague interconnections of all living things. (Russell, 2008, 2). To merely subjoin a vague feeling of the sacred to a purely secular pull in of nat ural interconnections is non to create a religion. And hence, the problem.One might take the view that there be generally two forms of pantheism over time the modish, tr determinationy version that seeks to sacralize the secular phenomenon of reputation, and a utmost more sophisticated form of pantheism made famous by Baruch Spinoza and his later pupil (of sorts) Friedrich Schelling. Both of these questions will be dealt with in this paper. First, we will deal with the contemporary readings on this subject, and then, the far more substantial questions of pantheism brought up by the Dutch philosopher.Standing in the Light is a book that says very little. It is heavy in vague emotional connectiveness, very light on definition and ontology. Ultimately, the light is whatever you want it to be it slew be a religious figure, a philosophical paper or merely a feeling, hence reducing it to nothingness by attempting to cover every emotive reaction (Russell, 2008, 3-4). In this view, she seeks to redefine atheism (cf scallywag 4) as a view where the universe is seen as not sacred. But since the conceit of the sacred is never defined, there atomic number 18 no atheists.Or, better, that this vulgar view of pantheism, which is reduced to a feeling of awe in the face of nature (as representing both good and evil, as she holds, 87ff), is itself atheism in that there is no God, that there is an awe in the face of natures grandeur. Few atheists would recoil at awe when looking at nature. In this kindred stain lies the work of Paul Harrison (2004). Again (35), he holds that nature is to be revered. It is unclear whether he thinks nature of god, since god is an elastic term that covers the object of ones awe or respect.His dispensing with philosophical rigor is typified in his manipulation of Anselms famous ontological argument for gods outliveence. In Harrisons case, he mutilates it beyond recognition. The original argument was, to summarize, that god is that ab out which nothing greater can be conceived. But since this object mustiness rush goence (since to have existence is to be greater) god must exist, since that would be the greatest thing conceptualizable. Harrison does not seem to understand the nature of this controversial view.He assumes (Harrison, 36) that nature is the greatest thing that can be conceived, and hence, is god. This has no bearing on the argument ascribed to Anselm of Canterbury. He also seems to completely misunderstand Aristotles argument from causality. On pageboy 38, Harrison holds that the skeptical answer rejects the necessity of a first cause, there is no need for one. If one can sound off a limitless future, one can imagine a limitless past. Since no one can imagine or visualize a limitless future, the same might be state of the past.Harrison seems to posit an actual religious element to pantheism in that it holds that matter is eternal, ever animated, always changing, and hence, it is a belief to be t aken on faith, and hence, religious. A softly interesting argument is his philosophy of history. He holds that history contains three causas the hunter gatherer stage, agricultural and technological (Harrison, 50-53). It goes similar this at one time, man lived in full accordance with nature as hunters and gatherers. Then he decided to become settled.This was the great evil settled gardening places man as master of nature. Only in the technological phase was nature reintroduced, permitting a rational eco-centrist to rebuild our planet. Making sense of this argument is difficult there are several fallicies first, that the hunter gatherer lives in accordance with nature. He seems to have the hidden premise that all things primitive must be eco-friendly. Second, that agriculture means that man masters nature. This seems hard to swallow, since the agriculturalist mind, up until the 20th century, worked as a partner of nature, not its master.The explicit Baconian idea of dominating n ature is incisively the beginnings of the industrial revolution. The argument is that when people no longer had any connection to nature, no longer lived off the land, they could then romanticize nature, and hence, see it for its own interest (Harrison, 52). In other words, when the technological revolution created urbanization and rape the landscape, the now alienated urbanite could make of nature of object of romantic devotion. It is precisely in the deviation of the land that one can then see it as an aesthetic object.Lastly, the author refuses to deal with the question of determinism (60). The pantheist determinism argument might look like this all things are interconnected, the force, the unity of the interconnection is divine, human beings are part of this divine interconnection and hence, to conclude, humans are determined by these connections. It is difficult to wiggle out of this argument, an argument that is not found in Harrisons book, but dismissed regardless. If free dom exists, it cannot be material. If it is not material, it is spirit.If it is spirit, then it must have a cause. But the concept of pantheism presented by Harrison posits no cause. Hence, human beings are merely determinations of material reality and hence determined. Harrison denies that human beings are determined, but does not develop how one can get out of the pantheist argument, unless one posits human beings as, to some extent spiritual beings and hence outside of the natural, public causal chains that are so evocative of reverence. This is another serious flaw. Next, we have the short section by Wood (2005).Wood is not so much arguing here for pantheism as for evolution, upon which all contemporary theories of pantheism seem to rest. This piece is basically an attack on fundamentalism, which is defined as that belief governing body that rejects evolution in that it rejects the principle of change inherent in all things. Pantheism has no belief system, only evolutionary ecology. One need not be a pantheist to accept everything that Wood says, it is a non-philosophical piece. Far more substantial is that work by Steinhart (2004) on the question of ontology.This is an interesting survey piece dealing with the nature of pantheism from the point of view of materialism, Platonism and Pythagoreanism. But just as interesting is his idea of the nature of god God, in traditional morality must be supernatural, complex (in the sense of maximal inclusivity), God must represent Himself to man, and God must be holy (Steinhart, 2004, 65-66). Of course most of these can be challenged. In Christianity, for example, God is not complex, he is simple. He is not merely supernatural, but exists within nature as its designer and guide (thought this is never an ontological connection).Nevertheless, the key to the argument is maximum inclusivity, which is not an attribute of God in traditional theology in the sense Steinhart means it, and it is question pray in terms of pantheism, since the argument presented her is that the nature god of the pantheists is by definition all inclusive, and hence, comes closest to the traditional idea of God. He seems to engage in the same logical fallacies as Harrison. Steinhart fails on several levels. First he fails to explain how the materialist whole can be holy, in any sense.Second, he fails to show how the disembodied forms of Plato can be associated with pantheism in the definition he provides. In fact, the relationship surrounded by the forms and matter is precisely Platos rejection of earlier Greek pantheism (referenced by Russell, 2008) and, more importantly, is nearly identical with the early Christian and Augustinian view of the relationship between God and creation. God is identified with nature as its guide and creator, but is not identified with nature simpliciter. This is a severe logical flaw.He has better luck with Pythagoras, though it is possible to see a similar objection arising. Nevertheless , it stay the case that this work also fails to do justice to pantheism. The greatest and most interesting approach to pantheism is the creation of Baruch de Spinoza. Here is an intelligent, logical and extremely interesting of the idea. near all the works surveyed reference him, but only for a short time, as it is clear that few of the above authors have spent the large quantity of time necessary to master the difficult system of the Dutch metaphysician.Spinoza is the greatest and most intelligent manifestation of the Pantheist idea, and hence, should be treated at length. Spinoza begins with the concept of magnetic core, which is to be identified with god. Substance is the in itself. That is, it is something that defines both affirmation, since affirmation requires negation (Parkinson, 1977, 451). Substance has gone beyond affirmation/negation because it is the whole, the everything. Hence,. Substance is its only name, and that incomplete.If burden in the Aristotelian sense is that which remains unchanging, that which survives change, for Spinoza, since all Aristotelian substances are part of a larger sphere of interconnections, the only real substance is Substance, or god. any things are determinations of God. There is no external reason for its existence. It is eternal causality. Of this Substance there are two Attributes, thought and extension, experienced as distinct but making reference to two forms of expression os substance relative to the limited sense experience of human beings.Further, these attributes are divided into a huge multiplicity of modes, which might be called all particular things, which are incomplete existences by definition. What is worth mentioning is that Spinoza holds that these attributes that subdivide into modes are not real. They are experienced, but this experience derives from the limited abilities of the human observer. But God in Himself is Substance that contains infinite attributes, only two of which are available to human beings.The attributes must be infinite because, given the nature fo Substance, there is nothing to constrain their development. A fully understood attribute of an infinite Substance is by definition infinite (Spinoza, 1927, 124-125). Science might struggle with this. First, it suggest that science is only a tiny form of knowledge in a ocean of infinity. In other words, science can only deal with incomplete experiences relative to the limited observational capacities of the person. A fact in the truest sense of Spinozas pantheism is that which contains all reality, it must be Substance and only Substance.Anything less would be limited, and hence abstract, outside of its true context and contingent. Even Spinozas epistemology is limited in the sense that sense data is only the persistence of a pattern of perception. Hence, there is no direct human mode of perceiving God. God is full interconnectedness (the phenomenon, th international of Modes relative to both attributes, i. e. thought and extension make up the same Substance relative to humans) that has its root in the Substance itself (the noumenon, outside of experience) (Rocca, 1996, 192). Spinoza writesHence it follows, firstly, that there is no cause, either external to God or within Him, that can excite Him to act buy food the perfection of his own nature. It follows, secondly, that God simply is a free cause for God alone exists from the necessity alone of His own nature. Therefore He alone is a free cause (Spinoza, 1927, 132) . Several things come from this first, that human beings are determined, being themselves manifestations of the divine nature, containing in themselves the two attributes of thought or extension, the only two forms of experience permitted to man.That this determination is a good thing in that all things are pre-determined in the infinite nature of God, and hence, there is little to be through but live peacefully. But it should also be clear that there is no emotive atta chment to this will-less and thought-less entity (Spinoza, 1927, 132). God is God only in that He is Substance. He is a metaphysical principle, not a cause of awe or worship. He is substance deduced logically in the following way A cause of a thing must exist either inside or outside the object being caused.The reason for a square to exist is not to be found in the square itself. There must be a cause, then, outside it, a cause that has made it necessary to exist. Hence, Substance, which exists necessarily, is uncaused. This is because if Substance (that which survives all change) has a cause outside itself, then it is not Substance that Substance must be it. Hence, there is a cause that is uncaused, Substance, and this is what survives all change, existing necessarily and the (logical) cause of all things (Spinoza, 1927, 124, On the Essence of God. also cf. Bennet, 1997)Friedrich von Schelling is another metaphysician who skirted the concept of pantheism, and is often considered o ne. Here we have a post-Spinozistic idea of the Spinozian concept of God, taking liberally from Spinoza and yet another interesting approach to the concept of pantheism. Schellings basic metaphysic is the spiritual exists as such in nature. pose this differently, nature is the physical expression of the spiritual, but constantly limited by materiality. Even further, the pantheism derives form the idea that nature eventually creates the conditions necessary for the spirit, or apprised life.Here, the idea of spirit deriving from nature is posited from the circular concept that nature is spirit in expression in matter (Bowie, 2001). The development of the spirit in nature moves like this 1. The absolute principle is the ground, just as in Spinoza, between the conscious and sub-conscious life, that is, sprit and matter respectively, since here, matter is merely slumbering spirit. 2. Nature and spirit are identical to Spinozas two modes, extension and thought respectively. Nature tend s to objectification, while spirit tends to subjetification, but there is no ultimate distinction between the two.3. These are held together in actual life by force attraction/repulsion light, gravity, while in spirit these forces take the form of knowledge, will, etc. 4. Both these forces are attributes (in Spinozas sense, not modes, since they are not particular and hence unreal, things) derive from the single Substantial source, not called Substance, but the Absolute. (Snow, 1996) 5. The movement of Substance then, is the reconciliation of opposites thought and extension, matter and spirit, object and subject. Spirit will suffuse matter, matter will be saturated with spirit.This is the evolutionary picture of Schelling preliminary to Darwin (and is interesting on that account alone). In other words, Schelling differs from Spinoza in granting some limited will to the otherwise abstract absolute the will for interpenetrating and the end of philosophy with a spiritualized matter. God will be present in matter in full when consciousness and matter merge, or more accurately, nature is suffused with consciousness. This paper has done two things first it basically dispensed with the contemporary literature in pantheism is non-scientific and hence non-philosophical.Instead, this paper has briefly summarized two major pantheist writers and metaphysician who are highly related in terms of basic ideas, Spinoza and schelling. In their view of pantheism, the absolute/substance is necessary existence. This is posited and proved because it is impossible to imagine a cause without origin, or a causal chain with ether no purpose or no beginning. Spinoza does not believe that causes exist eternally, but that Substance does time, and hence, cause, is a human, mental construct.A serious, philosophical pantheism avoids the problems mentioned above, and posits a Substance or Absolute that is conscious experienced in forms or modes. All things are God in that all things are ex pressions of God. References Russell, Sharman. Standing in the Light My Life as a Pantheist. Basic, 2008. Harrison, Paul. Elements of Pantheism. Media Creations, 2004. Wood, Harold. Practice of Pantheistic Mindfulness. Pantheistic plenty 24, 2005. Steinhart, E. Pantheism and Current Ontology. Religious Studies 40 pp 1-18 Parkinson, HGR. Hegel, Pantheism and Spinoza. The Journal of the History of Ideas. 38, 1977 449-459 Spinoza, Baruch de. Ethics and Other Writings. Joseph Ratner, Trans. Modern Library, 1927. Bennett, Jonathan. Spinozas Metaphysics. in The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza. Cambridge University Press, 1996. Pps 61-89 Della Rocca, Michael. Spinozas metaphysical Psychology. in The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza. Cambridge University Press, 1996. Pps 192-267 Bowie, Andrew. Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph von Schelling. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University Press, 2001. Snow, Dale. Schelling and the End of Idealism. SUNY Press, 1996.

About School Essay Example for Free

About School EssayI believe in school in a flash in days the programme kills our crea? vity. Not the teachers. The teachers are only there to help teach the curriculum. Now in days you cant save up whatever you want any more or do whatever you want any more in school. There is no choice. Its either op? on A or op? on B. Kids growing up in this era will have no imagina? on because its any bully forward stu$. Teacher get mad at you if you doodle on your paper or step out of line in the hall way. cipher more Satirical elements in the adventure of Huckleberry Finn essayKids wont want to be crea? ve because they wont know what crea? ve is. I %nd that the curriculum is to worried on geng the informa? on to the kids other than leng them %nd out ways to show the informa? on or talk about it. Its just all wri? ng and wri? ng, no free choice anymore. In the poem its the same thing. The boy gets made fun of and hurt because he was trying to be crea? ve. No one can do their own stu$ an ymore.

Is There Difference Between True And False Philosophy Essay

Is There Difference Between True And False school of thought EssayThe musical note between uprightness and false is often perceived as an easy preeminence to make, like a yes or no question. If you brood about something for example, then what you are saying is false, if you tell the loyalty then it is line up. This is one of many misconceptions in life the complexity behind the unassailable distinction between justnesss and falsities is immense. How evoke an idea be judged to be true up or false? One might say that a correct fact is true and an incorrect statement is false though the answer varies depending on the area of knowledge from which the statement is perceived. However, in order for in that location to be an absolute distinction there must be an absolute faithfulness. In this essay I will question the existence of an absolute truth in order to detect whether or not there is an absolute distinction between what is true and what is false.In order to answer the to pic question one must initiatory seek to define certain terms/parts of the question the first of which is true. What is truth? Different sources attempt to answer this question in different ways. The monolithic dictionary in Ms. Thorntons room defines it as anything that is public and independent of anyones belief Merriam Websters English dictionary as something eternal that is in accordance with fact or reality Dicitonary.com believes it is a judgment or proposition Michael Woolman, in his book Ways of Knowing, believes it is something that is logically necessary. The struggle to accurately define truth is partially referable to the fact that we are unable to determine whether or not truth is relative. The second term we must define is false. Merriam Webster believes that something that is false is nor genuine, nor faithful, nor loyal and is also scatty in naturalness and sincerity. Dictionary.com defines a falsity as a declaration of what is untrue and perhaps treacherous. Las tly, we must define absolute which is perhaps a more concrete word than the preceding two however it is significant to this paper to define it. Absolute refers to having no exception, restriction or qualification.In order for there to be an absolute truth, there must be validation. In order to prove an absolute truth, one must arouse a system of proof with which one can deduce the truths validity in every single situation and under every singly condition in timeless existence. An absolute truth must be true for all eternity. It must also remain unchanged forever and since we cannot determine whether this is true, and therefore any yell of absolute truth is ridiculous. Some might argue however that by making this statement, I am making an absolute claim. This is however false because there is a possible circumstance under which this claim could not have existed before people could reason. According to hubpages.com The propositional statement There are no absolutes, is definitel y not syntactically absolute, and not absolute in any real cognitive sense. It is a fact, that truth is not an object and does not exist without a mind, and hence unfeasible to be eternal. It is a fact, that truth is bound within the domain of concepts, and hence impossible to be eternal. It is a fact, that anything claimed as eternal, cannot be proven to be the case, because eternity does not exist in order to be used in the construction of any logically deductive proof. It is a fact, that no claim of truth for anything absolute, can be proven to be true by any stretch of the imagination.In math however we have a set of rules that can define an absolute truth. According to Adam Richards, who holds a degree in philosophy from Oxford, in mathematics we can define an absolute truth or falsity because we precisely define the rules of mathematics. In reality, we need to measure what we want to know, and since these measurements can never be exact enough, an absolute truth cannot exist. How true or false something is depends on how accurate our measurements were but in the purely deductive world of mathematics, we can define exactly true/false statements. I do not fully agree with Richards because I dont believe that everything in life is a mere calculation however I second his reason for the front end of absolute truths in mathematics.Outside of math any claim of an absolute truth is one that is either based on religious beliefs or is cerebrate to religion in one way or another. This is because they are claimed to be given by god. It is safe to say that everyone will agree with the fact that an absolute truth mandates a god due to the fact that it must be eternally true. Without a god there would be no absolute truth because there would be no eternity in the claim. To discredit theses claims, even though most of the words of god we know today have not been changed, we cannot prove that they will remain unchanged eternally. All bibles and scriptures have undergo ne changes and revisions by humans who have tailored them to suit their tastes. Humans are not absolute, and have no system for preventing change to anything that is supposedly absolute (hubpages.com).In conclusion, there is no absolute truth due to our inability to prove a claim eternally, and therefore no absolute distinction between what is true and what is false. Something that is not true is automatically false because there is no third option. If it is partially true or partially false than one can say that it has a true claim and a false claim however it is still sort out as either true or false.

Marketing Research Reflection

merchandising Research ReflectionMarketing Research DiaryMarketing Research Seminar 1Part matchless Prepargond Material1) What is the management decision conundrum facingDuPont?New type of motorcarpets (innovation)Can commercial segment be transferred to residential segment?Whether they should introduce the new collection into theresidential market.If the answer to that question is yesHow should be introduced?How will it be marketed?How will be broken down into proper(postnominal) decision-making areas?2) What is the marketing look problem facing DuPont?To determine consumer preferences and purchase intentions for theproposed new product3) Breakdown the full general marketing explore problem into component parts.The marketing look for problemcan be broken down into the following component partsWhat criteria are apply by heap in choosing carpets?What are the market shares of DuPont and its competitors?What is the size of it of the market segment interested in the newproduc t?What styles of carpets are preferred by ho practice sessionholds?What is the demographic and mental profile of the customers?How do people evaluate carpet brands in terms of the competitors and brand awareness?4) Developone suitable explore question and hypothesis for the marketing look problem.A possible interrogation question and hypothesis think to the marketing research problem isRQ On what variables can the specific market segment be identified?H It may be identified bydemographic, psychological f actuateorsPart 2 MY REFLECTIONS ON SEMINAR 1 later on criminal recordussing the case study and identified the research problem components, a conclusion was reached as to the topic to be researched for the whole semester, (Litter thrown and twistedfrom cars). Issues such as consumer characteristics, behaviour, attitudes, opinions,possessions and the environmental context of the problem are factors one necessitatesto bear in mind here. There is also a destiny to target specifi c markets, i.e.what type of consumers are we talking active here? Do the consumers realizethat there is a problem? Sub-consciously they probably do, but consciouslythey dont. Evaluating the pros and cons of the product would be useful inrealising the market potential and responsiveness from various consumersegments.Additionally,profiling of lifestyles, habits, activities of the target audience demographyand product image would desire to be assessed. A system of delivering theproduct would need to play off customer satisfaction and experience. Identifyingwhere the competition is for the product would need to be carried issue. I.e.areas that are non littered or are cleaned on a regular tush would adopt ahigher and better standard of living, while areas that do non have this, wouldsuffer the opposite. In relation to the main topic reached for research, onewould need to analyze the size of the problem, are the costs of cleaning it upaffordable per litter discarded what are the h ealth hazards and problemscr ingested by unclean litter on the streets can people littering the streets,when they appear not to love that they are littering the streets be termed as acriminal offence and finally, what can we do to change peoples attitudestowards this unsolved phenomenon is an issue that needs attention.Marketing Research Seminar 2Part One Prepared Material1a) Briefly, inclination of an orbit the main advantages of secondary teaching.The main advantages of secondary data areIt is accessible, relatively inexpensive and quickly obtainedSome are available on topics where it would not be feasible for afirm to collect primary dataIt also helps toDiagnose a sampling planFormulate an get hold of research design solving certain research questions and test some hypothesesInterpret primary data with more than insightValidate qualitative research findingsIdeas generated in secondary data can be used as a very strongfoundation to primary data design and collectionIt also a substantial help in theexploratory phase of the researchUnderstanding and defining the problemExtremely useful in defining the population and in structuringthe sample1b) Why should the reliability of promulgated statisticsvary over time?Measurement errors Measurement systems tycoon had changedHow old data can be depends on what you have researchingSources might discover being colouredGeographical boundaries might have changed by governmentPart Two carry out task and find instructionTaskPart of the research process is to do a search for secondarydata toHelp in understanding background to the issuesHelp in defining the research problemHelp in defining the population and in structuring the sample to be taken e.g. potential segments to be reachedGenerate hypotheses and alternative courses of actionSave time and money not re-inventing the wheelBelow are some tasks concerning secondary data.Answer in bullet pointsInformation for parts (v) and (vi) is quite detailed and would be a rot of time (and paper) for you to copy out you are asked only to give the location of every information you find and a short sentence or deuce describing the contentsYou do not need to print out any information from the web call upes suggested to you downstairs but you might want to save it to discIf you find information on new(prenominal) websites or in magazines, articles, journals, etc., please note the location and full reference and a short sentence close the content2a) For Seminar Group 1 LITTERthrown and twisted FROM CARSWrite short bullet point notesin the research diary on the following using secondary data and informationi)Size of the general litter problem e.g. amount litter per year, cost ofcleaning upii)Potential health problems and former(a) consequences (not only humans)iii)Legal aspects e.g. what is illegal, fines, etc.iv)Number of people worried by this mark off in the research diary thefull reference for the following with some short notes describing the content v)any information that might help profile the likes ofly people and places forlitter thrown from carvi)Any information on attitudes, barriers to changeThe following sources should levy helpfulhttp//www.tidybritain.org.uk/news/filthyfacts.asp?Sub=0Menu=0.26.12.244http//www.encams.org/information/publications/research/pubbehavstudylittercc1.pdfhttp//www.tidybritain.org.uk/information/publications/research/youthlitter.pdfAnd theres always the library(and google)Part 3 My reflections from Seminar Two (word limit 250)Although thereare advantages and disadvantages with regard to the use of primary andsecondary sources of data collection, one would need to identify which one isbest put to use in relation to the qualified matter. Depending on the researchquestion, both qualitative methods, which isnt measurable, i.e. statisticaldata is not used and quantitative methods (the use of statistical data to measuring rodthe validity of a phenomenon), can be used to address the research question. It depends on how much information one can get, in other words it is the use ofmarket intelligence to collate data.In Hofstede(1980), work connect values individualism / collectivism, power distance, anduncertainty, avoidance / uncertainty acceptance, and gender differences,Hofstede carried out research on a sample population of IBM workers from allover the world pickings into consideration the latter mentioned. From this onecould know how the Chinese behaved. International marketing utilises research,for example, would one introduce British Milk Chocolate to the Chinese people?If the Chinese dont like risky decisions then dont introduce the product in China. Moving on, the use of outdated data, e.g. 1967 to 74, could provide an inaccurateresearch final decision. Secondary sources of information will tend to be thenorm in this situation. In relation to the subject matter, Littering, onecould categorize the respondents into, sceptics unaware sympathisers andconverts. The idea is to make everyone converts (environmentally friendly) insociety. For example, if the Minister of Health, after identifying thecategories just mentioned, takes action one will need to identify the otherthree negative elements through the use of secondary data.Marketing Research Seminar 3Part One Prepared MaterialQ 1) LIST the main principlesof the info Protection Act (1998).FairAdequateRightsSpecificTransferAccuracyRetentionSecurityQ 2) What does the Office ofthe Information Commissioner define as ain data?From the DPA websiteTo determine whether you have any rights under the Data Protection Act (DPA) you essential(prenominal) first establish whether the information being held is the sort of information cover by the DPA.Rights will only rise in respect of information if-it relates to you,-you can be identified from the information itself or from thatinformation and other information which is, or is likely to come into thepossession of the data controller and,-The information is held electronically (e.g. on computer) or it isintended to be held in certain specific types of manual/paper- based filingsystems.Suchinformation is called personal data.Q 3a) Whatis Classic survey (or Market) Research?Classic Survey(or Market) ResearchDefined by MRS Code of Conduct asTheapplication of scientific research methods to obtain objective information onpeoples attitudes and behaviour based usually on representative samples of therelevant populations. The process guarantees the confidentiality of personalinformation in such a way that the data can only be used for researchpurposes.ClassiccoversQuantitative researchQualitative researchQ 3b) Why should exceptionalcare be exercised when undertaking Modelling/Data Fusion Projects?When undertaking Modelling /Data Fusion Projects, special care should be exercised to-protect the interests of data subjects-data not be inappropriately used during or after the data matchingprocessesMerging confidential survey data with other data at an individual personal record level does not constitute a several(predicate) or additional purpose, as long as the final data set protects the identity of the data subject.Q 4) The MRSCode of Conduct states that The general public and other interested partiesare entitled to complete assurance that every research project is carried outstrictly in accordance with this Code, and that their rights of privacy arerespected. It then gives the details of two specific things about whichassurance must be given. What are these? What other two things must respondentsbe informed about?These area)They must be assured that no information which could be used to identifythem will be made available without their pact to anyone other than theResearcher responsible for conducting the research.b)They must also be assured that the information they supply will not beused for any purposes other than those described and that they will not beadversely affected or embarrassed as a direct result of their parti cipation ina research project.Also,respondents must be informed abouta)The purpose of the research and the likely length of time necessary forthe collection of the informationb)Research findings themselves must always be reported accurately andnever used to mislead anyone, in any way. jump 2 My Reflections fromSeminar ThreeWhile reviewingprepared answers one was able to identify the research stake holders. Two taskswere then formulated ringly, to compile a list of things that respondentsshould be told in order to give informed consent, and a suitable writtenstatement would be given to respondents so that they can give their informedconsent to their participation in the research. This could act as a barrierto being able to get the right people to participate in this research that willbe carried out by this seminar root wording. The stakeholders identified are, theclients (i.e. the lecturer from the university) the respondents the market investigators (us) and the general public (i .e. people who work and live in thearea).For Task 1, theresearcher needs to make clear that the respondents co-operation with regardto the research being carried out is of no harm to them. Stating the purposeof the research in the initial stages could prove to be a good start of pointof contact. If it is a questionnaire, then it would be a lot easier to gaininformation from the respondent because they will not need to disclose their personalidentity. The researcher could give the impression of a short conversation atthe initial point of contact, in order to prolong and get as much informationas they can at heart a short period of time. One must realize that therespondent can withdraw at any stage of the conversation. The marketresearchers must make sure that they identify themselves at the initial stagesof contact with the respondent and if possible leave their contact details.For Task 2, there is the possibility of embarrassment. For example foreignstudents might not understand co mpletely, the purpose of the research. In thiscase the researcher has to give a detailed and easy explanation to what theiraims and objectives are.Marketing Research SEMINAR 4PART 1Prepared MaterialTask 1Choose ONE qualitative research method and give your reasons in bulletpoint format why you think it would be particularly suitable for researchingpeoples attitudes and behaviour towards one of the research questionsregarding littering you have identified.You shouldclearly and concisely state the research question at the beginning of youranswer.(Lengthexpected for your answer Between fractional and one page of A4 double spaced TimesNew Roman 12pt font)Task 2Collect at least 5 photos, pictures or images that you feel reflect yourthoughts and feelings about the environment in which you live.These may beimages of ANYTHING that sparks a reaction in your environment.There are noright or wrong answers (except anything that might give your fellow studentsoffence, use your gross sense abou t that).For example,people we asked to do in connection with mobile telephones brought in picturesas varied as clocks, comfy sofas, cups of coffee, friends, padlocks and manyothers as well as pictures of phones.Bring thesewith you to the seminar 4. dress prepared to explain why you choose the picturesand even tell about images that came to mind but you did not find.PART TWO My Reflections fromSeminar 4We began with ashort comparison within qualitative and quantitative approaches for collectingdata. After each student expressed his or her thoughts for which technique isthe most appropriate to be used, it was generalised by the seminar leader ofthe collection that for the purposes of our future project (litter thrown from cars)it is better to use the qualitative techniques. Therefore, by doing so, thedifferent qualitative techniques were expressed out in loud. These included themajor direct and indirect techniques which corresponds with the nidus group orobservation techniques. Th en, a question was set in the seminar group whichmethod is more appropriate for us to use for collecting primary data asinexperienced people? After students expressed their opinions, the preferredone was chosen by the seminar leader (method of questionnaire).Inthe second part of the seminar, the group was divided into subgroups of 2persons and we were experienced, at least for most of us, our first realinterview. In particular, each group had an interview (5mins) with each otherbased on some images (prepared material) which represent our feelings andthoughts about the environment we live in. By doing so, back to group, we allshare our information collected by each other and we allocated them intodifferent environmental categories (themes) for example pollution.For me, it wasmy first interview I ever had, it was a great opportunity to get familiar withnon-professional interview and I am in truth glad that I took part in this.Marketing Research SeminarFIVEPart One Prepared MaterialEv aluate the potential of ONEsampling method from the list below for conducting your research (including itsdrawbacks). Clearly link your evaluation of the chosen method to your researcha simple list of advantages and disadvantages is not sufficient these need tobe related to your research. (LITTER THROWN FROM CARS)Lengthexpected to your answer between half and one page A4 double spaced Times NewRoman 12 pt font.A classification of samplingtechniquesNon probability taste techniques-Convenience Sampling-Judgemental Sampling-Quota Sampling-Snowball SamplingProbability Sampling techniques-Simple Random Sampling-Systematic Sampling-Stratified Sampling-Cluster SamplingPART TWO MyReflections from Seminar Five (Word limit 200 300 words)In order to get a realistic conclusion to ones findings, the researcherwill need to remind themselves of the research question the method of surveyto be used in carrying out the research would also need to be evaluated andthe qualitative methods of approach (a questionnaire) should be finalised.For example, how does the consumer view the product to what extent isthere a problem? Do people acknowledge that there is a problem? These areissues the researcher needs to address. If needs be extra data will need to begathered, a bit more time would need to be taken, and eventually get to have amore accurate piece of data.In the method of survey, techniques such as face to face could reducecosts to assembly data a structured and easily read questionnaire needs to beformulated in order to gather a proper description of peoples feelings, andopinions. Whereby, open ended questions need to be avoided in the qualitativemethods of approach. The method of coding could be used to gather theweightings placed by various age groups on the subject matter. For example,Male or effeminate respondents, in which three different age groups can be gatheredmight prove to be a useful starting point.Possible questions to be included in questionnaire such as has therespondent eaten food in a car, in the last 30 days, or do they smoke in theircar? This could prove to be a hitter, with regard to extracting the rightanswer from the respondent. More important would be to be the safety of theresearcher. It would be advisable to carry out such research in the day time.Politeness is the delineate to getting the attention of potential respondents for thesubject matter.PART TWO My Reflections fromSeminar Six (Word limit 200 300 words)A more refinedquestion within the context of the questionnaire would be, how often does therespondent eat or drink in the car whereby, there will be a set of multiplechoice answers, can be deemed as a more appropriate measure of summing upinformation with regard to the subject matter (Littering the streets).Multiple choice answers such asa.More than once a dayb.About once a dayc.2-6 times a weekd.once a weeke.once every 2-3 weeksf.once a monthg.less than once a monthOne must beaware of the fact that (g.) is not possib le. However, it is good to have aproper representation of all possible scenarios represented in the questionnaire,so as to have the overall picture summed up.Although, thesafety of the researcher is important, it will be best to carry out theresearch during the day and within the university grounds. Why? With thechoice of a wide variety and greater number of students to choose from, it willgive the researcher the opportunity to gather more accurate answers, other thanapproaching people from the street. As stated previously, it will be advisableto group the respondents into certain age groups. If potential respondents arenot part of the university or not in the age group (18 19, 20 21, and 22 -23) wanted, OR are in an age group which you have already collected theinformation required, then thank them for their time and move on. If otherwise,then the researcher should do vice-versa.Mostimportantly, the researcher should make sure that the respondent fills in thequestionnaire if they meet age and gender requirements.Racial ethics isnot a point of concern here, because the littering of streets could be carriedout by just about anybody. Therefore, it will be advisable to gatherinformation from as wide an audience as they can. Additionally, the age groupsbeing used to carry out this research can be deemed as too narrow a view.Because, as earlier said littering the streets is done by just about anybody.Therefore, it will be advisable to widen the spectrum of the age groupspossibly, 16 to 35 year olds would be more convincing.PART TWO My Reflections from Seminar Seven (Word limit 200 300 words)Having attendeda different seminar, with a different research topic chewing gums, usingqualitative analysis to open-ended questions, sort of seems to be a moreappropriate research method. With 5 students fully accomplishing the tasksrequired from the questionnaire, from a center of 7 it gives one the impressionthat the research topic is not enticing. The use of post-it notes wasdelegated to the students to use as a means of describing what they have doneon each of the questionnaires answered. Each researcher was told to initialtheir name on each post-it note. Additionally, the gender of the respondent wasrequired on the post-it note. The use of a coding formulae for the answers tothe questions on the questionnaire such as (0 for NO and 1 for a YES answer),can be deemed as adequate for this exercise. Also, a coding formula was usedfor the each age group on the questionnaire. The answers given by therespondents to the questionnaires for each of the open-ended questions are thenwritten in the middle of the post-it. This gives a clearer understanding ofthe answers given in which a comparison of the qualitative methods andquantitative methods are then analyzed.Categorising thepost-it notes according to the answers given by the respondents, is a veryuseful measure to identify any trends. Although, some answers were rathersarcastic, it acts as a useful remind er that the results can provide an eyeopener into other relevant topics, for example, recommendations and sarcasm.The use ofqualitative methods (questionnaire and interviews) other than quantitativemethods can be deemed as more appropriate to this research topic. This isbecause it gives the researcher a hands-on approach to what is actuallyhappening, other than already established data which might prove to beoutdated.PART TWO My Reflections fromSeminar Eight (Word limit 200 300 words)The use ofmanual coding to analyze data, can act as a useful method in providing the sortof weightings which the researcher would need to identify with when trying toreach conclusions about the subject matter. Using a spreadsheet to give aclearer picture of the weightings on the codes used to analyze the categories ofconstrunts from the questionnaire can prove to be a pedagogical tool indecision making. As stated previously, the age group needs to be widened, soalso the fact whether one has a car or no t, does not make a difference withregard to the subject matter, which is Litter discarded on the streets. Theconstructs such as feelings about pollution, health, damage to the environment,denial and blame, a problem or no problem of waste, visual, and individualresponsibility, are good classifications in putting the subject matter intoperspective. However, they need to be widened further to gain an in-depthunderstanding of the subject matter.Additionally,one could use SPSS. This is a statistical software package, which enables theresearcher to carry out data transformation, matrix algebra, macro andscripting facilities. It has excellent data management facilities and highquality graphics. It is applicable to many different research fields, althoughit has particular strengths in the areas of the social sciences, it can bedescribed as one of the most friendliest statistical packages of its kind.

Deep River Shusaku Endo English Literature Essay

Deep River Shusaku Endo English Literature EssayShusaku Endo has had a long career in literary works. He has written some very compelling novels that dive deep down into the journey of spiritual learning. He has fixated most of his writings on ii main crossing issues such as eastern and western cultures specifically between Japanese culture and Christianity. His novels have sited a wide range of issues of pagan and spiritual identity, alienation, and personal pledge to faith. The story he wrote Deep River is a fascinating journey of revelation for the characters involved, especially the relationship between Mitsuko has with Otsu.Otsu and Mitsuko first see in college, Otsu is an awkward religious student and Mitsuko is a woman who has no real passion for life. She decides she wants to steal Otsu away from the god he believes in. She invites Otsu to a party to ask him about his beliefs, to my surprise he comes clean saying he is unsure of what he believes in. Mitsuko forces Otsu to drink and wont stop forcing him until he forsakes god, but he drinks till he throws up, never tolerant up on god. No it sounds like these two would never see each separate again later on something like that. To your dismay Mitsuko cant leave Otsu be, she says he must falsify his belief in god. She then gives him the opportunity to be her boyfrigoal if he gives up his faith. I hvirtuosostly cant believe anyone would force that upon someone. To my dismay they end up having sex and dating for several months until she breaks his heart. Otsu now depressed, leaves and doesnt return, although they do of course, meet again. Mitsuko has a problem because she feels no passion in life she goes through her life and this story with a horrible aspect of emptiness in herselfOn Mitsukos honeymoon instead of spending time with her new husband she hears Otsu is in France and searches him out. They meet up and come up with a new word for god onion because to Mitsuko the term god means slide fas tener. Otsu is on the complete opposite page, saying god is everything everywhere. The French actually say he is a heretic for his beliefs that other religions are also true and that god uses both sin and suffering for the greater fair. Otsu is opposed by his teachers because of this statement he gives evil lurks within good, and good thingsgood things can lie within evil as well (65). I believe what Endo is trying to express be that god has the power to turn every sin into some kind of good. Later in the story another quote comes up, god has many faces. I dont think god exists simply in the churches and chapels of Europe. I think he is also among the Jews and the Buddhists and the Hindus (121). Otsu wants to live a life of selfless sacrifice for all people, which at the time Mitsuko finds to be a waste of time. I believe the reason she seeks out Otsu so many times in the story even though she doesnt really know what it she is curious for she is searching for god which in the en d brings love. Otsu signifies a belief in unity of all. He believes in combining all faiths and caring for all mankind, generating an colossal social assembly of love.Even with being called a heretic, Otsu never revokes his beliefs and maintains a strong faith and trust in Jesus. While talking to Mitsuko he decides to retell her he has dedicated his existence to chasing only one thing the love of that onion, Love is all the onion has imparted to us. The thing we are most lacking in our modern world is love love is the thing no one believes in anymore love is what everyone mockingly laughs at, and that is why someone like me wants to hap my onion with dumb sincerity (119). Otsu follows his beliefs to India at the river Ganges. This is a place that is very sacred to the Hindus, they travel here when they are dying with the hope to have their bodies cremated and their ashes pass on into the holy river. Otsu goes here to sacrifice himself so he can help these people make the dying j ourney. He literally carries the people to the river who can further walk. yield is the focus of Otsus faith. Jesus is the number one symbol of sacrifice. He gave up his life for mankinds sins. Jesus symbolically lugs all of the anguishes of mankind on his shoulders when he is made to carry his own cross to death. Otsu imitates the carrying of suffering by plainly transporting the deceased and dying on his back to the River Ganges. Otsu sees more than just the task he is doing, he feels something pure and necessary in putting the suffering of others on his shoulders, by sacrificing himself. Mitsuko sees what Otsu is doing as a waste of his own life, because he is getting nothing out of it in her eyes. Otsu knows he will not change the world or cure suffering, he is doing this act of sacrifice for the good of the people, if there is a benefit that comes from it then Otsu knows the act will not be the true good act of sacrifice.By the end of the story you start to get the feeling tha t Mitsuko finally understands the belief of sacrifice and love for others. She decides to bathe in the holy river joining the Hindus with her own prayer, which she still believes is a lie, she still has that emptiness until she sees the ultimate sacrifice.Sacrifice is to give and receive nothing in return except for happiness in you. To love is to sacrifice Otsu makes sacrifices for people trying to turn their sorrow into love. The end of the story brings the biggest sacrifice, when Otsu becomes mortally wounded, while saving Sanjo, who is a person who most wouldnt sacrifice for because of his cultural insensitiveness. But because Otsu and his beliefs he saves the man and in the end giving his life. This act makes his sacrifice even greater, he is not sacrificing for a loved one or a family member but for a stranger who does not know or appreciate what Otsu does for him. Otsu has Christ-like, selfless love that rises above all cultural, racial, and religious prejudices to embrace al l of humanity, just like the river Ganges, which he saw as a deep and flowing river of love accepting all, rejecting neither the ugliest of men nor the filthiest (185). This is when we finally understand what lies at the heart of Christianity Love and sacrifice for others. Otsus sacrifice is one of pure love for mankind, deaf, blind and dumb to how pointless it may be.